Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A10s's global score of 73.8. The Galaxy A70 is a a little heavier cellphone than Galaxy A10s, but both of them are equally thin. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11.
The Galaxy A70 features a sharper display than Galaxy A10s, because it has a bit larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a greater quantity of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A10s features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a little longer battery life than Galaxy A10s, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A10s. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A10s, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.