Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than the Galaxy A10s's 73.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is way heavier but somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A10s, and they were only released 1 months apart. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold features a much better display than Galaxy A10s, because it has a lot better 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a better screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior camera than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way higher (4K) video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Fold counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A10s, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A10s. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Galaxy A10s, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.