Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than Galaxy A10s, having a overall score of 90.8 against 73.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's body is newer than the Galaxy A10s's, but it's heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A10s, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite bigger screen and a higher pixel quantity per inch of display.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser MP, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot better video definition. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A10s. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A10s, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.