Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s's 73.8 score. The Galaxy Note 5 is a much older and a little heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, but Samsung made it just a little thinner anyway. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy A10s features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and way more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A10s has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A10s features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 5 takes better videos and photos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera with more mega-pixels and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Although Galaxy Note 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A10s. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 5, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A10s, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.