Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, having a overall score of 77.7 against 73.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version and Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11, providing the user some extra features. Galaxy Note3 is a just a little bit thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, but both weight the same.
The Galaxy Note3 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Note3 features a CPU that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A10s one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has 4 less cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have a back facing camera with a 13 megapixels, the Samsung Galaxy Note3 also counts with a way better video quality.
Galaxy A10s counts with a slightly better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A10s has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.