Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, having a global score of 79.5 against 73.8. Samsung Galaxy Note7 is a just a bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Galaxy A10s has a bit better performance than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (although they are slower).
Galaxy Note7 features a brighter display than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better count of pixels per screen inch and a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy Note7 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low light environments and a lot better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A10s has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.