Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is way better than Galaxy A10s's 73.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A10s, but it's just a little lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a lot better display than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a lot better display pixels density and a way better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. Galaxy S20 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S20 features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a much better camera than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy S20's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A10s's battery performance.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A10s. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S20, else you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A10s, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.