Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A10s, with a global score of 75.8 against 73.8. Galaxy S7 Active is a noticeably older, noticeably thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A10s. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a way higher quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A10s features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The Galaxy A10s counts with more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A10s also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video. Galaxy S7 Active's battery lifetime is just as good as Galaxy A10s's battery lifetime.
Although Galaxy S7 Active is a better device, it costs more than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A10s. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S7 Active, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A10s, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.