Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 271 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than Galaxy A10s, having a score of 80.1 against 73.8. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version. Although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better phone than Galaxy A10s, we must highlight that it's also way heavier and much thicker.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher screen density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A10s counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A10s also counts with a camera with a better 13 megapixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A10s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A10s. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A10s, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.