Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Galaxy A10s, with a general score of 94.6 against 73.8. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide very similar OS features. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A10s's, but it's much heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A10s, because it has a higher pixel density, a bigger display and a lot higher 1768 x 2208 resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A10s, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior camera than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A10s. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy A10s, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.