Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, having a score of 79 against 73.8. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's body weights the same than Samsung Galaxy A10s, but it's notably thicker.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per screen inch and a much better 1080 x 2160px resolution. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 112 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with a way higher 19 MP resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A10s counts with a much better battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 39 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.