Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, having a general score of 81.4 against 73.8. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11, so it provides the user some extra features and a performance increase. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's body is a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, even though both were released with only a few months difference.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much higher display density.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a much better video quality and a much higher resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A10s features better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.