Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A10s, having an 81.1 score against 73.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, we must tell that it's also a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A10s, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a higher pixels quantity in each screen inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 64 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way better video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way more expensive than Galaxy A10s, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.