Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than Galaxy A10s, with a 79 score against 73.8. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is better than Galaxy A10s, it must be noted that it's also heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user identical operating system features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a bit bigger display and more pixels per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better camera than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a lot better video resolution and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a 26 percent bigger battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S costs more than Samsung Galaxy A10s, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.