Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-07-02 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Galaxy A11, having a 93.3 score against 73.3. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's design is newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than Galaxy A11. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy A11 comes with Android 11 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much greater performance than Galaxy A11, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64 bits processor. Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a much better looking display than Galaxy A11, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1170 x 2532px resolution and much more pixels per inch of display.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A11 counts with longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A11. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro, else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A11, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.