Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A11's global score of 73.3. The iPhone X body is a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy A11, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The iPhone X has a much sharper display than Galaxy A11, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and way more pixels per display inch.
The iPhone X has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy A11, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with more RAM and a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone X features a superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The iPhone X has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have the same aperture, the iPhone X also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A11 features a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 47 percent larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A11. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A11, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.