Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is much better than Samsung Galaxy A11, with an 82 score against 73.3. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, the Apple iPhone XR is an older, just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A11. Apple iPhone XR features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A11, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater screen pixels density and a little bit higher 828 x 1792 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A11 has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone XR, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The iPhone XR has a greater performance than Galaxy A11, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a 64-bits CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A11 features superior battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Apple iPhone XR captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a way better video resolution.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A11. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A11, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.