Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A11, getting an 80 score against 73.3. Google Pixel 3's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A11, but it's somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel 3 features just a little better performance than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a way greater pixel density. Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A11, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A11 features much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A11 features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 is also cheaper than the Galaxy A11, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.