Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is better than Galaxy A11, with an 80.7 score against 73.3. The Google Pixel 3 XL body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A11, but it's a bit heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater display pixels density and a lot better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A11 has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A11 counts with a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3430mAh. The Google Pixel 3 XL captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a lesser MP camera in the back, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 3 XL also counts with a lot better video quality.
The Google Pixel 3 XL costs more than Galaxy A11, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.