Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is better than Galaxy A11, with an 81.9 score against 73.3. Even though Google Pixel 4 and Galaxy A11 were released only 8 months apart, Google Pixel 4's construction is just a bit thicker but a little bit lighter. The Google Pixel 4 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2280px resolution and much more pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A11 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A11, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A11, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy A11 features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A11. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A11, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.