Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the Samsung Galaxy A11, having an 82.9 score against 73.3. Although the Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the Samsung Galaxy A11, we must tell that it's also just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A11, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a way higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A11 features a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A11 counts with a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Google Pixel 4 XL takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has a back camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a lot higher video definition.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A11. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A11, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.