Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than Samsung Galaxy A11, getting a overall score of 82.9 against 73.3. Google Pixel 4a's construction is a bit thicker but somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A11, and both were released only a couple months apart. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Google Pixel 4a features a better screen than Galaxy A11, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much better pixels count per inch of screen. The Google Pixel 4a features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a also has 4 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4a shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A11, because although it has a less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. Google Pixel 4a features just a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A11 has longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27% bigger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A11. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A11, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.