Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A11's overall score of 73.3. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G and Samsung Galaxy A11 were only released with a couple months difference, the Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is a little bit lighter but just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A11.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A11, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy A11, because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a lot higher video definition. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A11, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A11 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A11. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy A11, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.