Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A11, getting a global score of 89 against 73.3. The Google Pixel 5 is a lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy A11, but both have the same thickness. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 features a brighter display than Galaxy A11, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much better display pixels density. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Google Pixel 5 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A11. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A11, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.