Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a little bit better than Galaxy A11, getting a overall score of 77.7 against 73.3. Although the HTC One M9 is incredibly older and somewhat thicker than Galaxy A11, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version while Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version.
HTC One M9 counts with a quite superior performance than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also has a 64-bit processor, an additional GPU and 1 GB more RAM. The HTC One M9 counts with a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display pixel density and a better 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A11 counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A11 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A11 has a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
HTC One M9 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
HTC One M9 costs a bit more money than Galaxy A11, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.