Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is just a bit better than Galaxy A11, with a global score of 77 against 73.3. HTC U Ultra is a just a little lighter cellphone than Galaxy A11, but both are 0.31inches thick. Galaxy A11 and HTC U Ultra count with similar CPUs, because although the HTC U Ultra has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
The HTC U Ultra features a sharper screen than Galaxy A11, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a lot greater screen density. The HTC U Ultra features a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
HTC U Ultra takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a less mega-pixels back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Galaxy A11 counts with greater battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A11. If you want to save some money, you can get Galaxy A11, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.