Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-02 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit has an overall score of 77, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A11's score of 73.3. The LG G7 Fit is a somewhat lighter device than Samsung Galaxy A11, but they are 0.31inches thick. These phones include Android OS, but LG G7 Fit has 8.1 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version, so it offers lots of additional features.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A11, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a lot higher screen pixel density. The LG G7 Fit's CPU is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A11 one, because although the LG G7 Fit has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG G7 Fit counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A11 counts with greater battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG G7 Fit has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A11, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back camera with more megapixels and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.