Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-02 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A11's score of 73.3. Both of these phones include Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A11 has Android 11, so it provides a lot of extra features. Even though LG V30S ThinQ is notably older than the Samsung Galaxy A11, it's construction is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A11, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixels number per display inch and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A11, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. LG V30S ThinQ takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy A11, because it has a lot better (4K) video quality, a camera in the back with a higher 16 mega-pixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy A11 counts with better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A11. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy A11, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.