Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is better than Galaxy A11, getting an 81.2 score against 73.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version. Even though the LG V40 ThinQ is older than the Galaxy A11, it's body is just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a much higher display density.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A11, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A11 counts with greater battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A11, because although it has a back camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
LG V40 ThinQ is more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A11, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.