Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than the Galaxy A11, having an 87.1 score against 73.3. LG Velvet is a a little bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A11, but both are 0.31inches thick. The LG Velvet features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a higher display pixels density, a much better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger display. LG Velvet has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet has a way better camera than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the LG Velvet also has a much more megapixels camera in the back and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. LG Velvet features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has an 8 percent greater battery size.
LG Velvet costs a lot more than the Galaxy A11, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.