Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A11, getting an 89.6 score against 73.3. Despite being the best cellphone we compare here, the Motorola edge body is somewhat thicker and a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A11. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version.
The Motorola edge counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola edge features a brighter screen than Galaxy A11, because it has a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution, a higher pixel amount per screen inch and a little larger display.
Motorola edge has a much better camera than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola edge also has a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a much better resolution. Motorola edge counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A11, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola edge has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A11, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Motorola edge costs a lot more than the Galaxy A11, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.