Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A11's general score of 73.3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is extremely newer than the Samsung Galaxy A11's, but it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version, so it gives a lot of extra features.
Galaxy A11 features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a little bigger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A11, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A11, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.