Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G is better than Galaxy A11, with a score of 81.5 against 73.3. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Moto G 5G has the older 10 version and Galaxy A11 has Android 11. The Moto G 5G is a heavier and notably thicker phone than Galaxy A11. The Moto G 5G features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto G 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Moto G 5G features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A11, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger screen. Moto G 5G counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A11, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G features a greater camera than Galaxy A11, because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels, a way better video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video. Motorola Moto G 5G counts with superior battery life than Galaxy A11, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.