Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-07-02 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 166.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force has a general score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A11's global score of 73.3. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Moto Z Force has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version while Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version. The Moto Z Force construction is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy A11, although it was released 4 years before.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A11, because although it has less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a brighter screen than Galaxy A11, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and much more pixels per inch of display.
Moto Z Force counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A11, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A11 features a bit superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a better camera than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Although Motorola Moto Z Force is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A11. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A11, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.