Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-02 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 has a global score of 77.6, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A11's 73.3 overall score. Although Motorola Moto Z3 is older than the Samsung Galaxy A11, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto Z3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A11 has Android 11, so it provides some additional features.
Moto Z3 features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto Z3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160px.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A11, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 MP resolution and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution. The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A11, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A11 has better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A11. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A11, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.