Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is better than the Galaxy A11, having a general score of 80.7 against 73.3. Motorola One Vision's construction is older, a little heavier and a little thicker than the Galaxy A11. Motorola One Vision features a brighter display than Galaxy A11, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2520 resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola One Vision has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Vision also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola One Vision counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Motorola One Vision also has 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Vision takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back camera. The Samsung Galaxy A11 features just a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 14% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.