Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A11's score of 73.3. The Motorola One Zoom body is older, somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A11. The Motorola One Zoom has a much better screen than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot more pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Motorola One Zoom features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A11, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 384 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Zoom features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has more RAM.
The Motorola One Zoom features a greater camera than Galaxy A11, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. Motorola One Zoom has a battery duration that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A11 one.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A11. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola One Zoom, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A11, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.