Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A11's score of 73.3. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Motorola razr (2020) body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A11, but it's a little bit heavier.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 876 x 2142 and more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light environments. The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A11 counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A11. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A11, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.