Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 268 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than the Galaxy A11, with a global score of 79.2 against 73.3. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s construction is way newer and extremely thinner than Galaxy A11's, although it's also heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the newer 15 version and Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A11 has a way better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 14 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A11 has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot better camera than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.