Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a score of 76.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A11's 73.3 global score. These devices work with Android OS, but nubia Red Magic 5S has older 10 version and Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version. Nubia Red Magic 5S's design is heavier and thicker than Galaxy A11. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bigger display and more pixels per display inch.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little faster processor than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a lot better video resolution. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A11. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A11, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.