Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than Galaxy A11, having an 85.5 score against 73.3. The Galaxy A51 is a just a bit lighter phone than Galaxy A11, but both of them have the same thickness. Both devices in this comparison use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
Galaxy A51 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A51 has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a lot greater pixel quantity per inch of display, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution. Galaxy A51 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A51 has a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery life in Samsung Galaxy A11.
The Galaxy A51 is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A11, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.