Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Galaxy A11, having a general score of 90.8 against 73.3. Even being the best phone in this review, Galaxy Note 20's body is just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the Galaxy A11. Galaxy Note 20 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a quite larger screen and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a way higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy Note 20 has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A11, because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A11. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A11, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.