Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A11, getting a general score of 98.9 against 73.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy A11, we must highlight that it's also somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A11 has Android 11, so it counts with some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has way more pixels per inch of display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A11, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A11. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A11, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.