Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A11's score of 73.3. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A11, but it is a little lighter. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of screen and a much higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Galaxy A11 has better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A11. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A11, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.