Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy A11, getting a overall score of 98 against 73.3. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version, providing a couple nice extra features. Even being the best phone we compare here, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a somewhat thicker and extremely heavier phone than the Galaxy A11.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 10 GB more RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A11, because it has a lot greater display pixels density, a bit larger display and a lot higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A11, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has longer battery performance than Galaxy A11, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A11. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A11, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.