Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A11, getting a 77.8 score against 73.3. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S5 Sport has a newer 4.4.2 version and Samsung Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features and increased performance. Galaxy S5 Sport's construction is lighter than Samsung Galaxy A11, although it's thicker and was released many years before.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A11, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have a 2 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a much better screen than Galaxy A11, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater screen pixel density and a higher 1920 x 1080px resolution.
The Galaxy A11 has much more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 16 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a higher 16 MP resolution.
Galaxy A11 counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A11. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A11, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.