Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is much better than the Galaxy A11, having a overall score of 81 against 73.3. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should provide you identical operating system features. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is somewhat heavier and notably thicker than Galaxy A11.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher pixel number per inch in the display and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has 64 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a 1% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A11. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A11, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.