Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A11, getting an 88.5 score against 73.3. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A11 has Android 11, so it counts with a lot of extra features and improved performance. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip and the Samsung Galaxy A11 were only released with a few months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip design is just a bit heavier but a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A11.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip has a brighter screen than Galaxy A11, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a lot greater screen density and a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy Z Flip features much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a lot better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A11 has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A11. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A11, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.