Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 166.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A11, with a 92.3 score against 73.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is just a little heavier but a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A11, and both of them were released with only 1 months difference. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a quite better performance than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a bit bigger display and a lot more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy A11 features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A11, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.