Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A11, with a 94.6 score against 73.3. Both devices we compare here use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Samsung Galaxy A11 were only released 3 months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is somewhat thinner but incredibly heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a greater hardware performance than Galaxy A11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a larger screen, a higher pixels density and a lot better 1768 x 2208 resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much higher video definition.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A11. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy A11, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.